References

Altenberg, B. 1982.The genitive v. the of-construction: A study of syntactic variation in 17th century English. Malmö: CWK Gleerup.

Clark, H.H. & E.V. Clark. 1977. Psychology and Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Fischer, O. 1992. Syntax. In: N. Blake (ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language, vol. II: 1066 – 1476. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 207 – 408.

Heine, B. 1997. Possession: Cognitive Sources, Force, and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hinrichs, L. & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi. 2007. Recent changes in the function and frequency of Standard English genitive constructions: a multivariate analysis of tagged corpora. English Language and Linguistics 11.437 – 474.

Leech, G. & N. Smith. 2006. Recent grammatical change in written English 1961 – 1992: Some preliminary findings of a comparison of American with British English. In: A. Renouf & A. Kehoe (eds.), The changing face of corpus linguistics. Amsterdam, New York: Rodopi. 185 – 204.

Mustanoja, T.F. 1960. A Middle English Syntax, part I. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.

Nichols, J. 1988. On alienable and inalienable possession. In: W. Shipley (ed.), In Honor of Mary Haas. Berlin: de Gruyter. 475-521.

Osselton, N. 1988. Thematic genitives. In: G. Nixon & J. Honey (eds.), An historical tongue: Studies in English linguistics in memory of Barbara Strang. London: Routledge.

Quirk, R, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London, New York: Longman.

Rosenbach, A. 2002. Genitive Variation in English: Conceptual Factors in Synchronic and Diachronic Studies. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Rosenbach, A. 2004. The English S-genitive: A Case of Degrammaticalization?. In: O. Fischer, H.Perridon& M. Norde (eds.), Up and down the Cline - The Nature of Grammaticalization. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. 73-96.

Rosenbach, A. 2006. Descriptive genitives in English: A case study on constructional gradience. English Language and Linguistics 10. 77-108.

Rosenbach, A. 2008. Animacy and Grammatical Variation – Findings from English Genitive Variation.Lingua 118 (2). 613 - 644

Rosenbach, A. 2013. Combing elicitation data with corpus data. In: Manfred Krug & Julia Schlüter (eds.), Research Methods in Language Variation and Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 279 – 294.

Rosenbach, A. & L. Vezzosi. 2000. Genitive constructions in Early Modern English: New evidence from a corpus analysis. In: R. Sornicola, E. Poppe& A. Shisha-Halevy (eds.), Stability, variation and change of word-order pattern over time. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 285 – 307.

Seiler, H. 1983. Possession as an Operational Dimension of Language. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.

Szmrecsanyi, B. 2006. Morphosyntactic Persistence in Spoken English: A Corpus Study at the Intersection of Variationist Sociolinguistics, Psycholinguistics, and Discourse Analysis. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Szmrecsanyi, B., A. Rosenbach, J. Bresnan & C. Wolk. 2014. Culturally conditioned language change? A multi-variate analysis of genitive constructions in ARCHER. In: M. Hundt (ed.), Late Modern English Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 133 – 152.

Thomas, R. 1931. Syntactical Processes Involved in the Development of the Adnominal Periphrastic Genitive in the English language. PhD thesis, University of Michigan.

Zaenen, A., J. Carlette, G. Garretson, J. Bresnan, A. Koontz-Garboden, T. Nikitina, M.C. O’Connor & T. Wasow. 2004. Animacy encoding in English: Why and How. In: D. Byron & B. Webber (eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 ACL workshop on discourse annotation, Barcelona, July 2004. 118 – 125.

Created with the Personal Edition of HelpNDoc: Easily create Help documents